Abstinence Only vs. Abortion Rates - Free Essay Example.
The United States government claims that abstinence-only is the best form of sexual education, however I believe that abstinence-only programs are counterproductive. They ignore contraceptive effectiveness, disregard spreading of sexually transmitted infections, and prevent the exploration of sexuality. Abstinence-only sexual education is ideologically skewed because it focuses on teaching.
Basil Beighey. Resume; Rants; Great Scenes; Services; Portfolio; Menu.
Abstinence-only programs are particularly notorious for heteronormativity, as it is inherent to the curriculum that students marry before engaging in sexual intercourse. According to Liptak (2015), same-sex couples were not able to marry until 2015, and even then they may face difficulties obtaining a marriage license (Liptak, 2015). Santelli (2006) wrote that because of the same-sex marriage.
The Adolescent Family Life Act in 1981 introduced abstinence-only programs that gained momentum in the late 1990s (Brown). These programs have the good intention of persuading young people to wait until marriage before having sex, but abstinence-only programs are not achieving this goal and are flawed by the distorted and biased perspective that they promote.
In 1996, the United States government passed a law giving funding to states that offered abstinence-only sex education programs in public schools. Since this time, over half of a billion dollars has been given to states to promote abstinence-only programs. (Brody) After a study of four of the schools with abstinence only programs showed, that teens who had participated in the class were no.
Abstinence-only sex education is a form of sex education that teaches not having sex outside of marriage. It often excludes other types of sexual and reproductive health education, such as birth control and safe sex. Comprehensive sex education, by contrast, covers the use of birth control and sexual abstinence. Evidence does not support the effectiveness of abstinence-only sex education.
Rector is writing to those who oppose abstinence-only and presenting them an alternative argument to possibly alter their opinion. At the beginning of this process, my knowledge of the abstinence-only method was very little. I personally went through a comprehensive sex ed course in high school, so it was rarely something I ever thought about. After reading Rector’s article, however, I can.